Our company logo

Biodiversity and its Management on the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming

Share It:

Biodiversity and its Management on the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming

Biodiversity and its Management on the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming

Authors(s): N. P. Matson

Publication: Yale F&ES Bulletin

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type:

Location:

Abstract: The National Elk Refuge is home to 178 species of birds, 49 species of mammals, 382 species of vascular plants, five species of native fish, five species of reptiles and amphibians, and unknown numbers of species of invertebrates and non-vascular plants. The refuge is charged with protecting, enhancing, and restoring populations and habitats of all the species found on its grounds. Since its inception, however, management has focused on elk. Supplemental feeding has supported higher numbers of elk than the refuge ecosystem can handle, and it has long been recognized that the large concentration of these ungulates has had negative impacts on a number of biotic communities. Elk have reduced and eliminated woody tree and shrub cover along riparian areas, limited aspen regeneration, reduced sage-grassland structural diversity, and rendered areas prone to exotic plant invasion. If current management continues, these vegetative communities and their associated wildlife species will continue to decline. This paper recommends that the refuge needs: (1) to define its commitment to the protection of biodiversity before it can manage biodiversity more sustainably; (2) to manage on a regional level and coordinate with other agencies and private landowners; (3) to establish a comprehensive monitoring and data analysis program to determine if management prescriptions are successful and to adapt management to changing information and conditions; (4) to reduce supplemental feeding and the size of the elk herd; (5) to take measures to restore degraded communities; and (6) to build a constituency for biodiversity. The report is designed to be a resource for future activities and a summary of past trends in management and biodiversity.

Keywords: wildlife, management, National Elk Refuge, Jackson Hole, Teton County, animal, mammal, ornithology, bird, Aves, ungulate, bison, Bison bison, elk , wapiti, Cervus elaphus, Cervidae, fish, ichthyology, reptile, amphibian, herpetology, population, mortality, habitat, winter food supplementation, food, feeding, forage

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID1490
REF TYPEJournal Article
AUTHORSN. P. Matson
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1Yale F&ES Bulletin
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLEBiodiversity and its Management on the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming
PAGE DESC101-138
Incl appendices
LOCATION
ACADEMIC DEPT
UNIVERSITY
DOC TYPE
PUB VOLUME104
PUB NUMBER
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSwildlife, management, National Elk Refuge, Jackson Hole, Teton County, animal, mammal, ornithology, bird, Aves, ungulate, bison, Bison bison, elk , wapiti, Cervus elaphus, Cervidae, fish, ichthyology, reptile, amphibian, herpetology, population, mortality, habitat, winter food supplementation, food, feeding, forage
ABSTRACTThe National Elk Refuge is home to 178 species of birds, 49 species of mammals, 382 species of vascular plants, five species of native fish, five species of reptiles and amphibians, and unknown numbers of species of invertebrates and non-vascular plants. The refuge is charged with protecting, enhancing, and restoring populations and habitats of all the species found on its grounds. Since its inception, however, management has focused on elk. Supplemental feeding has supported higher numbers of elk than the refuge ecosystem can handle, and it has long been recognized that the large concentration of these ungulates has had negative impacts on a number of biotic communities. Elk have reduced and eliminated woody tree and shrub cover along riparian areas, limited aspen regeneration, reduced sage-grassland structural diversity, and rendered areas prone to exotic plant invasion. If current management continues, these vegetative communities and their associated wildlife species will continue to decline. This paper recommends that the refuge needs: (1) to define its commitment to the protection of biodiversity before it can manage biodiversity more sustainably; (2) to manage on a regional level and coordinate with other agencies and private landowners; (3) to establish a comprehensive monitoring and data analysis program to determine if management prescriptions are successful and to adapt management to changing information and conditions; (4) to reduce supplemental feeding and the size of the elk herd; (5) to take measures to restore degraded communities; and (6) to build a constituency for biodiversity. The report is designed to be a resource for future activities and a summary of past trends in management and biodiversity.
NOTES
URLADDRESShttp://www.yale.edu/environment/publications/bulletin/104pdfs/104Matson.pdf
COPYRIGHT

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.