Our company logo

Coyote Ecology in Jackson Hole

Share It:

Coyote Ecology in Jackson Hole

Coyote Ecology in Jackson Hole

Authors(s): D. Wachob, S. Anderson, R. Wiggelsworth and N. McClennen

Publication:

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type: annual report

Location:

Abstract: Objectives 1. Collect data on coyote ecology before the establishment of wolves in GTNP. 2. Determine differences between coyotes residing in GTNP and coyotes living in adjacent developed areas. Findings and Status Development, in the form of housing, roads, and human activity, had significant effects on coyote populations. Decreased home range and decreased diurnal activity were observed in the developed areas of Jackson Hole. Disease surveys indicated no differences between the areas. Coyotes are affected by roads and traffic during winter and summer in the developed areas and during only summer in GTNP. Despite movement of wolves into the area in the winter of 1998/99, no permanent residence was established within our study areas. Thus, our data continues to be coyote ecology without the influence of reintroduced wolves. We are currently analyzing habitat and diet differences. Final reports will be sent in May of 1999.

Keywords: animal, mammal, canine, Canidae, Canis, Canis latrans, Canis lupus, coyote, wolf, Jackson Hole, Teton County, ecology, human activity, Grand Teton National Park, suburban area, radio collar, population, mortality, disease, food

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID1417
REF TYPEReport
AUTHORSD. Wachob, S. Anderson, R. Wiggelsworth and N. McClennen
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLECoyote Ecology in Jackson Hole
PAGE DESC
LOCATION
ACADEMIC DEPT
UNIVERSITY
DOC TYPEannual report
PUB VOLUME4251
PUB NUMBER
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSanimal, mammal, canine, Canidae, Canis, Canis latrans, Canis lupus, coyote, wolf, Jackson Hole, Teton County, ecology, human activity, Grand Teton National Park, suburban area, radio collar, population, mortality, disease, food
ABSTRACTObjectives
1. Collect data on coyote ecology before the establishment of wolves in GTNP.
2. Determine differences between coyotes residing in GTNP and coyotes living in adjacent developed areas.

Findings and Status
Development, in the form of housing, roads, and human activity, had significant effects on coyote populations. Decreased home range and decreased diurnal activity were observed in the developed areas of Jackson Hole. Disease surveys indicated no differences between the areas. Coyotes are affected by roads and traffic during winter and summer in the developed areas and during only summer in GTNP. Despite movement of wolves into the area in the winter of 1998/99, no permanent residence was established within our study areas. Thus, our data continues to be coyote ecology without the influence of reintroduced wolves. We are currently analyzing habitat and diet differences. Final reports will be sent in May of 1999.
NOTES
URLADDRESShttp://science.nature.nps.gov/servlet/Prmt_ReportSearchView?REPORT_ID=4251
COPYRIGHT

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.