Our company logo

Predators shape river world top-down.

Share It:

Predators shape river world top-down.

Predators shape river world top-down.

Authors(s): S. Milius

Publication: Science News

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type:

Location:

Abstract: Finds that birds are prospering more outside a national park designed for their protection than inside it. Diversity of bird species around waterways near Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming; Effect of a lack of predators on the diversity of species; Report of the bird diversity by Peter B. Stacey and Joel Berger. In an anti-intuitive tale of predators and prey, riverside birds are prospering more outside a national park designed to protect them than inside the park, say wildlife biologists. Strips of land cradling waterways, or riparian zones, that are outside the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park have more-diverse bird populations, says Peter B. Stacey of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque. He and Joel Berger of the University of Nevada at Reno report that these unprotected zones also have higher numbers of certain species than comparable spots inside the park. The researchers argue that this apparent quirk makes sense in terms of a much-debated view that predators at the top of a food chain influence its character more than their prey do. Inside the park, moose abound, feasting on rich willow patches and other waterside growth that birds need as well. Predators that kill moose, such as grizzlies, have long been gone from the region. Outside the park, human hunters keep moose numbers in check, which ends up preserving more waterside habitat for birds than is available inside. This concept of top-down effects from predators sounds reasonable, but it's been hard to prove. For one thing, it's not easy to add and subtract bears just for the sake of experiments. Stacey and Berger realized, however, that people effectively served as experimental stand-ins for the other top guns in the ecosystem. With this part of the equation, the finding of higher bird diversity on the riparian land outside the park fits nicely with predictions about top-down effects of predators, even two-legged ones with orange hats.

Keywords: animal, bird, Aves, ornithology, Grand Teton National Park, habitat, predation, mammal, ungulate, moose, Alces alces, bear, grizzly bear, Ursidae, Ursus arctos horribilis, human activity, hunting

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID973
REF TYPEJournal Article
AUTHORSS. Milius
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1Science News
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLEPredators shape river world top-down.
PAGE DESC40
LOCATION
ACADEMIC DEPT
UNIVERSITY
DOC TYPE
PUB VOLUME158
PUB NUMBER3
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSanimal, bird, Aves, ornithology, Grand Teton National Park, habitat, predation, mammal, ungulate, moose, Alces alces, bear, grizzly bear, Ursidae, Ursus arctos horribilis, human activity, hunting
ABSTRACTFinds that birds are prospering more outside a national park designed for their protection than inside it. Diversity of bird species around waterways near Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming; Effect of a lack of predators on the diversity of species; Report of the bird diversity by Peter B. Stacey and Joel Berger.

In an anti-intuitive tale of predators and prey, riverside birds are prospering more outside a national park designed to protect them than inside the park, say wildlife biologists. Strips of land cradling waterways, or riparian zones, that are outside the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park have more-diverse bird populations, says Peter B. Stacey of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque. He and Joel Berger of the University of Nevada at Reno report that these unprotected zones also have higher numbers of certain species than comparable spots inside the park.

The researchers argue that this apparent quirk makes sense in terms of a much-debated view that predators at the top of a food chain influence its character more than their prey do. Inside the park, moose abound, feasting on rich willow patches and other waterside growth that birds need as well. Predators that kill moose, such as grizzlies, have long been gone from the region. Outside the park, human hunters keep moose numbers in check, which ends up preserving more waterside habitat for birds than is available inside.

This concept of top-down effects from predators sounds reasonable, but it's been hard to prove. For one thing, it's not easy to add and subtract bears just for the sake of experiments. Stacey and Berger realized, however, that people effectively served as experimental stand-ins for the other top guns in the ecosystem. With this part of the equation, the finding of higher bird diversity on the riparian land outside the park fits nicely with predictions about top-down effects of predators, even two-legged ones with orange hats.
NOTES
URLADDRESS
COPYRIGHT

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.