Our company logo

Prey Responses to Re-Colonizing Wolves and Grizzly Bears

Share It:

Prey Responses to Re-Colonizing Wolves and Grizzly Bears

Prey Responses to Re-Colonizing Wolves and Grizzly Bears

Authors(s): J. Berger

Publication:

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type: annual report

Location:

Abstract: Objectives The recent extinction of wolves and grizzly bears from 95-99% of the contiguous USA and Mexico has altered predator-prey dynamics. The primary objective of this work is to evaluate how varying predation pressure (contemporary, past, and novel) affects bison, elk, and moose. This type of information is necessary to understand how current predation, and its loss and restoration, shapes prey ecology and behavior. Ungulate responses to potential predators and scavengers will be evaluated by gathering data on foraging rates when exposed to simulated sounds of wolves, ravens, and novel and neutral stimuli projected through a speaker. Comparison have already been completed with predator exposed bison and elk and moose from northern circumpolar environments. Findings and Status Moose have demonstrated to date the most complex responses to olfactory and auditory playbacks. Where predation has occurred on offspring, mothers terminate feeding at higher rates to canid calls and to bear odors than when offspring have survived. Alaskan moose are more sensitive to scavenger and carnivore cues than Wyoming moose. In Wyoming however, predation rates on newborns have generally been low, and the disproportionate fewer offspring found in GTNP and surrounding environs is more likely due to low pregnancy rates. Bison from northern environments do not show greater sensitivity to the above cues than do bison from either Yellowstone or Grand Teton National Parks. However, the variance in responses are increasing in Yellowstone Park relative to Grand Teton park. Elk wintering in GTNP are more responsive to wolf vocalizations now than they were in 1997-1998. These latter responses are likely the result of increased predation by wolves. Continuing research is focusing upon the pace at which adaptive responses to predators occurs under varied predation pressure.

Keywords: moose, Alces alces, animal, mammal, ungulate, Grand Teton National Park, grizzly bear, bear, Ursus arctos horribilis, Ursidae, predation, wolf, canine, Canidae, Canis lupus, raven, Corvus corax, Corvidae, brucellosis, bison, Bison bison, Cervidae, elk, Cervus elaphus, wapiti, forage, Yellowstone National Park

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID394
REF TYPEReport
AUTHORSJ. Berger
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLEPrey Responses to Re-Colonizing Wolves and Grizzly Bears
PAGE DESC
LOCATION
ACADEMIC DEPT
UNIVERSITY
DOC TYPEannual report
PUB VOLUME21231
PUB NUMBER
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSmoose, Alces alces, animal, mammal, ungulate, Grand Teton National Park, grizzly bear, bear, Ursus arctos horribilis, Ursidae, predation, wolf, canine, Canidae, Canis lupus, raven, Corvus corax, Corvidae, brucellosis, bison, Bison bison, Cervidae, elk, Cervus elaphus, wapiti, forage, Yellowstone National Park
ABSTRACTObjectives
The recent extinction of wolves and grizzly bears from 95-99% of the contiguous USA and Mexico has altered predator-prey dynamics. The primary objective of this work is to evaluate how varying predation pressure (contemporary, past, and novel) affects bison, elk, and moose. This type of information is necessary to understand how current predation, and its loss and restoration, shapes prey ecology and behavior. Ungulate responses to potential predators and scavengers will be evaluated by gathering data on foraging rates when exposed to simulated sounds of wolves, ravens, and novel and neutral stimuli projected through a speaker. Comparison have already been completed with predator exposed bison and elk and moose from northern circumpolar environments.

Findings and Status
Moose have demonstrated to date the most complex responses to olfactory and auditory playbacks. Where predation has occurred on offspring, mothers terminate feeding at higher rates to canid calls and to bear odors than when offspring have survived. Alaskan moose are more sensitive to scavenger and carnivore cues than Wyoming moose. In Wyoming however, predation rates on newborns have generally been low, and the disproportionate fewer offspring found in GTNP and surrounding environs is more likely due to low pregnancy rates. Bison from northern environments do not show greater sensitivity to the above cues than do bison from either Yellowstone or Grand Teton National Parks. However, the variance in responses are increasing in Yellowstone Park relative to Grand Teton park. Elk wintering in GTNP are more responsive to wolf vocalizations now than they were in 1997-1998. These latter responses are likely the result of increased predation by wolves. Continuing research is focusing upon the pace at which adaptive responses to predators occurs under varied predation pressure.
NOTES
URLADDRESShttp://science.nature.nps.gov/servlet/Prmt_ReportSearchView?REPORT_ID=21231
COPYRIGHT

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.