Our company logo

Trumpeter Swan Food Habits, Forage Processing, Activities, And Habitat Use

Share It:

Trumpeter Swan Food Habits, Forage Processing, Activities, And Habitat Use

Trumpeter Swan Food Habits, Forage Processing, Activities, And Habitat Use

Authors(s): J. R. Squires

Publication:

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type:

Location: Laramie WY

Abstract: Wintering swans selected wide (mean 37m, range 10-91m ), low velocity (mean 0.06m/sec., range 0-0.27 m/sec) streams, that supported a greater biomass of macrophytes and tubers compared to random sites. On wintering areas, both plant senescene and herbivory were significant forces in reducing macrophyte biomass. Swan herbivory removed 16% of total macrophytes on Fish Creek. On the National Elk Refuge, trumpeter swan herbivory removed 42% of the foliage and 285 of the tubers of Potamogeton pectinatus. The dominant macrophytes present on Wyoming winter ranges included, Chara spp. (24.3%0, Elodea canadensis (25.6%), Myriophyllum exalbescens (18.8%), and Potamogeton pectinatus (25.3%). Ninety percent of the diet of wintering swans was composed of Chara spp. (36.8%), Elodea canadensis (29/6%), and Potamogeton pectinatus tubers (23.4%). Chara spp. and Elodea canadensis were eaten approximately in proportion to their abundance on winter ranges. Potamogeton pectinatus tubers accounted for only 0.5% of the biomass of aquatic plants present on wintering areas, yet comprised 23.4% of the diet. Swans ate more tubers (38.5%, P=0.1) in the spring compared to winter. Based on the true metabolizable energy (TMEn), digestive efficiency, and nutritional characteristics (protein and NDF), the winter and spring foods in declining order of quality were: Potmogeton pectinatus tubers, Elodea canadensis, Chara spp., Myriophyllum exalbescens, and Ceratophyllum demersum. The average throughout time for all forages was 239 min. Swans passed food quickly with low digestive effiiency. Swans increased their feeding time from 29.6% in the winter to 44.5% in the spring. During the winter, swans fed little in the morning (0.169) and increased their feeding rate throughout the day until night, when they fed at their highest rate (0.494). Wintering swans reduced feeding at a high rate throughout the day and night suggesting spring-use areas were important in establishing endogenous reserves for reproduction. Although endogenous reserves affect swan productivity (Anderson-Harild 1981, Bacon and Anderson-Harild 1989, Beekman 1991), the quality of nesting territories was also an important factor affecting swan productivity. Productive pairs occupied nest sites with a greater macrophyte biomass compared with nonproductive pairs. Females of productive pairs also appeared to take shorter recesses from incubation and incubated longer compared to females of nonproductive pairs. Invertebrate biomass did not differ between productive and nonproductive pairs.

Keywords: National Elk Refuge, Jackson Hole, Teton County, Fish Creek, habitat, animal, bird, Aves, ornithology, swan, water bird, waterfowl, Anatidae, trumpeter swan, food, forage, Olor buccinator, population, nest, nesting

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID1465
REF TYPEThesis
AUTHORSJ. R. Squires
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLETrumpeter Swan Food Habits, Forage Processing, Activities, And Habitat Use
PAGE DESC
LOCATIONLaramie WY
ACADEMIC DEPTWyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
UNIVERSITYUniversity of Wyoming
DOC TYPE
PUB VOLUME
PUB NUMBER
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSNational Elk Refuge, Jackson Hole, Teton County, Fish Creek, habitat, animal, bird, Aves, ornithology, swan, water bird, waterfowl, Anatidae, trumpeter swan, food, forage, Olor buccinator, population, nest, nesting
ABSTRACTWintering swans selected wide (mean 37m, range 10-91m ), low velocity (mean 0.06m/sec., range 0-0.27 m/sec) streams, that supported a greater biomass of macrophytes and tubers compared to random sites. On wintering areas, both plant senescene and herbivory were significant forces in reducing macrophyte biomass. Swan herbivory removed 16% of total macrophytes on Fish Creek. On the National Elk Refuge, trumpeter swan herbivory removed 42% of the foliage and 285 of the tubers of Potamogeton pectinatus. The dominant macrophytes present on Wyoming winter ranges included, Chara spp. (24.3%0, Elodea canadensis (25.6%), Myriophyllum exalbescens (18.8%), and Potamogeton pectinatus (25.3%). Ninety percent of the diet of wintering swans was composed of Chara spp. (36.8%), Elodea canadensis (29/6%), and Potamogeton pectinatus tubers (23.4%). Chara spp. and Elodea canadensis were eaten approximately in proportion to their abundance on winter ranges. Potamogeton pectinatus tubers accounted for only 0.5% of the biomass of aquatic plants present on wintering areas, yet comprised 23.4% of the diet. Swans ate more tubers (38.5%, P=0.1) in the spring compared to winter.

Based on the true metabolizable energy (TMEn), digestive efficiency, and nutritional characteristics (protein and NDF), the winter and spring foods in declining order of quality were: Potmogeton pectinatus tubers, Elodea canadensis, Chara spp., Myriophyllum exalbescens, and Ceratophyllum demersum. The average throughout time for all forages was 239 min. Swans passed food quickly with low digestive effiiency.

Swans increased their feeding time from 29.6% in the winter to 44.5% in the spring. During the winter, swans fed little in the morning (0.169) and increased their feeding rate throughout the day until night, when they fed at their highest rate (0.494). Wintering swans reduced feeding at a high rate throughout the day and night suggesting spring-use areas were important in establishing endogenous reserves for reproduction. Although endogenous reserves affect swan productivity (Anderson-Harild 1981, Bacon and Anderson-Harild 1989, Beekman 1991), the quality of nesting territories was also an important factor affecting swan productivity. Productive pairs occupied nest sites with a greater macrophyte biomass compared with nonproductive pairs. Females of productive pairs also appeared to take shorter recesses from incubation and incubated longer compared to females of nonproductive pairs. Invertebrate biomass did not differ between productive and nonproductive pairs.
NOTES
URLADDRESShttp://uwadmnweb.uwyo.edu/fish_wild/abstracts/squires_j/index.html
COPYRIGHT

3 comments (Add your own)

1. Billy wrote:
Short film/music video making as a hobby how clteaxy is it done? Other video-making questions included ?I have made a couple of videos using an older version of Imovie. One was a seven-minute music video/ joke I made for a friend, and it came out quite nicely. The other was a three-minute joke short that I also filmed. However, getting my friends together to film (it was a collective project, as most films are) was INTENSELY annoying/difficult. I had to organize dates, times, and heckle reluctant friends for props and participation for ages. However, I enjoyed editing it and putting together the clips a lot, and I was really happy with the outcome. (It took me about five months, but it was worth it!) However, my friends seem iffy about wanting to make more films, which I would love to do. They were jazzed about the idea originally, but when they realized how much work it really was, I think they were turned off the idea some. The thing is, I still want to make videos. The other common option I know about for video making is making things like music videos to tv shows and whatnot. This would be good I suppose because it would be entirely my own project and I wouldn't have to involve/pester anybody else. Problem is, it's so COMMON! Everyone seems to be obsessed with making fanvids . It's kind of annoying to me, and I can't really see myself as a fan video maker. I still really enjoy making videos, though. While I'm working with a relatively simplistic and annoying editing program (First version of imovie it's pretty crappy) and I certainly don't have anything more than a common camcorder and tripod, I want to do it as a hobby, as entertainment. What other kinds of videos can I make that aren't fanvids, and don't really need the commitment/obligation of other people? My other question is, when people DO make fanvids, what is your process? How do you get the clips and film onto your computer? Do you buy DVDs or get the clips offline? I've had quality problems with getting videos from the web usually, youtube videos are kind of crappy. I want to start making higher quality videos. Can someone explain what their whole process to making fanvids/ videos in general?

Mon, April 2, 2012 @ 2:11 AM

2. lxenkjpquy wrote:
9pGTXH nbdzdnvxoust

Mon, April 2, 2012 @ 3:44 PM

3. daciojccus wrote:
PnolWd isobxxxqcpel

Thu, April 5, 2012 @ 12:59 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.