Our company logo

Wildlife Resources: The Elk of Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Share It:

Wildlife Resources: The Elk of Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Wildlife Resources: The Elk of Jackson Hole, Wyoming

Authors(s): T. W. Clark

Publication: Yale F&ES Bulletin

Publisher:

Publication Date: 0000-00-00

Type:

Location:

Abstract: The Jackson Hole, Wyoming, elk herd lacks an effective ?commons institution? for its management. Conflict over management is particularly intense for the segment of the herd that winters in the National Elk Refuge. The fundamental problem is that too many elk are concentrated in too small an area on the refuge in winter, leading to a high incidence of the disease brucellosis, vulnerability to tuberculosis, degradation of plant communities, loss of biodiversity, and high supplemental feeding costs. These substantive problems are accompanied by process or procedural problems: a large number of organizational participants, who have identified various problems in the situation, have been unable to resolve their differences. The decision process has been characterized by lawsuits, rigidification of opposing positions through the NEPA process, unclear goals, competing problem definitions, ineffective organizational mechanisms for addressing problems (including lack of public participation), and weak leadership. This situation can be attributed to institutional factors (such as the struggle for control and states? rights), contextual factors (such as changes in the uses and values of the elk refuge and the role of the public in resource management), and leadership factors (such as the centralization, professionalization, and bureaucratization of management agencies). Three measures could help in clarifying and achieving common interests in the elk case. First, community-based participatory groups could build trust, skill, and civic knowledge. Second, government could establish a better decision process and leadership. Finally, a new goal of ?restoring wild patterns? could alleviate many of the substantive problems of the current feed-ground concentrations of elk.

Keywords: Jackson Hole, National Elk Refuge, Teton County, animal, mammal, ungulate, elk, wapiti, Cervus elaphus, Cervidae, wildlife, population, behavior, management, winter food supplementation, food, feeding, forage, disease, brucellosis

BIBLIOGRAPHY ID1488
REF TYPEJournal Article
AUTHORST. W. Clark
PUB DATE0000-00-00
DATE STR0000-00-00
PUB TITLE1Yale F&ES Bulletin
PUB TITLE2
DOC TITLEWildlife Resources: The Elk of Jackson Hole, Wyoming
PAGE DESC171-87
LOCATION
ACADEMIC DEPT
UNIVERSITY
DOC TYPE
PUB VOLUME104
PUB NUMBER
PUB EDITION
EDITORS
PUBLISHER
TRANSLATOR
ISBN
LIBRARY INFO
SOURCE
KEYWORDSJackson Hole, National Elk Refuge, Teton County, animal, mammal, ungulate, elk, wapiti, Cervus elaphus, Cervidae, wildlife, population, behavior, management, winter food supplementation, food, feeding, forage, disease, brucellosis
ABSTRACTThe Jackson Hole, Wyoming, elk herd lacks an effective ?commons institution? for its management. Conflict over management is particularly intense for the segment of the herd that winters in the National Elk Refuge. The fundamental problem is that too many elk are concentrated in too small an area on the refuge in winter, leading to a high incidence of the disease brucellosis, vulnerability to tuberculosis, degradation of plant communities, loss of biodiversity, and high supplemental feeding costs. These substantive problems are accompanied by process or procedural problems: a large number of organizational participants, who have identified various problems in the situation, have been unable to resolve their differences. The decision process has been characterized by lawsuits, rigidification of opposing positions through the NEPA process, unclear goals, competing problem definitions, ineffective organizational mechanisms for addressing problems (including lack of public participation), and weak leadership. This situation can be attributed to institutional factors (such as the struggle for control and states? rights), contextual factors (such as changes in the uses and values of the elk refuge and the role of the public in resource management), and leadership factors (such as the centralization, professionalization, and bureaucratization of management agencies). Three measures could help in clarifying and achieving common interests in the elk case. First, community-based participatory groups could build trust, skill, and civic knowledge. Second, government could establish a better decision process and leadership. Finally, a new goal of ?restoring wild patterns? could alleviate many of the substantive problems of the current feed-ground concentrations of elk.
NOTES
URLADDRESShttp://www.yale.edu/environment/publications/bulletin/104pdfs/104Clark.pdf
COPYRIGHT

No comments (Add your own)

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.